http://visitmix.com/images/10logo_100.jpghttp://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Rich Interactive Applicationshttp://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/en-usFri, 19 Oct 2007 16:02:28 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)<P>Interactive?&nbsp; mmm&nbsp; mmmm&nbsp; so it doesn't matter that millions are confortable with the term "Internet", you want to call them Interactive...&nbsp; way to go.</P>http://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Comments/266/Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:02:28 GMThttp://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Comments/266/0http://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Comments/266/AggBug.aspxInteractive?&nbsp; mmm&nbsp; mmmm&nbsp; so it doesn't matter that millions are confortable with the term "Internet", you want to call them Interactive...&nbsp; way to go.solartoy0http://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Comments/266/Trackback.aspxWhy do you insist on calling RIAs Rich <STRONG>Interactive</STRONG> Applications instead of Rich <STRONG>Internet</STRONG> Applications? Just stick to the commonly accepted term please.http://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Comments/265/Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:35:23 GMThttp://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Comments/265/0http://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Comments/265/AggBug.aspxWhy do you insist on calling RIAs Rich Interactive Applications instead of Rich Internet Applications? Just stick to the commonly accepted term please.Erwyn0http://visitmix.com/blogs/Mossyblog/Rich-Interactive-Applications/Comments/265/Trackback.aspx