<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:evnet="http://www.mscommunities.com/rssmodule/"><channel><title>Comment Feed for Google Loses, and Net Neutrality Doesn't Win (Joshua on MIX Online)</title><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.visitmix.com/blogs/joshua/google-loses-and-net-neutrality-doesnt-win/rss/default.aspx" /><description>Google Loses, and Net Neutrality Doesn't Win</description><link>http://www.visitmix.com/blogs/Joshua/Google-Loses-and-Net-Neutrality-Doesnt-Win/</link><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:24:49 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:24:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>EvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3188.26527, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)</generator><item><title>Re: Google Loses, and Net Neutrality Doesn't Win</title><description>It wasn't a PR stunt, they wanted to make sure they got the open access requirements into the more valuable parts of spectrum to make sure that the stuff they did could be used on it. It's not any more complicated than that.&lt;br /&gt;</description><comments></comments><link>http://www.visitmix.com/blogs/Joshua/Google-Loses-and-Net-Neutrality-Doesnt-Win/?CommentID=1009</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:24:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visitmix.com/blogs/Joshua/Google-Loses-and-Net-Neutrality-Doesnt-Win/?CommentID=1009</guid><evnet:views>0</evnet:views><evnet:viewtrackingurl>http://www.visitmix.com/1009/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0</evnet:viewtrackingurl><evnet:previewtext>It wasn't a PR stunt, they wanted to make sure they got the open access requirements into the more valuable parts of spectrum to make sure that the stuff they did could be used on it. It's not any more complicated than that.</evnet:previewtext><dc:creator>jeffyjones</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://www.visitmix.com/1009/Trackback.aspx</trackback:ping></item></channel></rss>